My Friend Hank, the Beatles, Jesus and the Pew Forum


I have a friend named Hank who doesn’t like the Beatles. Hank isn’t so much anti-Beatles as he’s anti-Beatlemania.  Every time he hears a Beatles song he says all he can think of is whether or not Paul is wearing shoes on the cover of Abbey Road.  All that stuff kind of ruins it for him.  In the same way  Hank says, he gets why some people are so turned off by Christianity.

This got me thinking once again about the difference between the religion OF Jesus and the religion ABOUT Jesus.  I tend to really like Jesus, yet I live in a part of the country where most of my co-religionists, the Unitarian Universalists, are not Christians.  Not only are we not Christians, we are, I am sorry to say, anti-Christian.  My friend Hank and the Beatles, however have helped me to understand more about why.   I happen to identify as a UU Christian and I turn once again to the religion OF Jesus and the religion ABOUT Jesus to help me explain and understand a bit better why I love John, Paul, George and Ringo and don’t care whether or not Paul is dead.

The religion OF Jesus is centered on the teachings attributed to Jesus in the gospel accounts we have of his ministry.  The religion ABOUT Jesus was constructed by people who made an institution around the idea of worshipping Jesus as a god.  The religion OF Jesus sees Jesus as a teacher who taught  about peace-making, forgiveness, sharing resources, helping others who are hungry, naked, sick, and accepting people who are very unlike yourself and rejected by upstanding religious and civil society.  The religion ABOUT Jesus sees Jesus as a god who was tortured so that you might get into Heaven and avoid your own torture in Hell.  The religious life in the religion OF Jesus is about practicing peace making, forgiveness, sharing, and helping others who are who poor, sick, tired, hungry, naked, homeless,  and learning to get along with and  understand people who are not like you.  The religious life in the religion ABOUT Jesus is centered on having a personal relationship with and/or appeasing Jesus so you can go to Heaven.  The religion OF Jesus is social and relational.  The religion ABOUT Jesus is personal.

Both the religion OF Jesus and the religion ABOUT Jesus have their pitfalls.  The religion OF Jesus can turn into  a purely  civil social justice experience, that leaves out a spiritual center or grounding with or without the God of Jesus.  The religion ABOUT Jesus can get so narcissistic that the goal of getting oneself into Heaven obscures the fact that your own next door neighbor might be living in poverty or suffering from cancer, not to mention a host of other issues Jesus taught about that you could be ignoring while worrying about the state of your soul being saved or not.

Phil Zuckerman points out  in his Huffington Post blog the recent Pew Forum poll on Religion and Public Life just confirms what we already knew:

White Evangelical Christians are the group least likely to support politicians or policies that reflect the actual teachings of Jesus.

Evangelicals love Jesus for what he does for them. Through his magical grace, and by shedding his precious blood, Jesus saves Evangelicals from everlasting torture in hell, and guarantees them a premium, luxury villa in heaven. For this, and this only, they love him. They can’t stop thanking him. And yet, as for Jesus himself — his core values of peace, his core teachings of social justice, his core commandments of goodwill — most Evangelicals seem to have nothing but disdain.

Zuckerman’s explanation for this incongruity (or glaring hypocrisy) among Evangelicals is that religion in itself is a big Rorschach test.  “People look at the content of their religious tradition — its teachings, its creeds, its prophet’s proclamations — and they basically pick and choose what suits their own secular outlook.”

I disagree, at least in part, because in my own case, I think it works both ways,  and that people can look for core religious and philosophical values in themselves and then form political and social world views.

The people following the religion OF Jesus who support universal health care and social welfare programs, and say, The Federal Department of Peace, do so, at least in my case because partly, if not wholly for spiritual reasons.  I form my political opinions on these issues, not because they will get me into heaven, but in my quest to seek how to be most fully human, among the teachers I look to for guidance is Jesus and what does Jesus have to offer on these matters, in essence, What Would Jesus Do? Jesus would make peace, Jesus would heal everyone, Jesus would provide for the needy.   Is there a Beatles song for this? Well, it ain’t Rocky Raccoon.


2 thoughts on “My Friend Hank, the Beatles, Jesus and the Pew Forum

  1. I think you miss the over all view of “What would Jesus do?” Jesus never calls for the government, especially the government of the United States, to be the answer and/or provider for people. Jesus never called for the Roman government to do a better job of taking care of the poor, sick and the unfortunate. Who did Jesus go after, the religious leaders of the time.
    If the government is the agents of change,
    Then where is the government?
    Where is the government….
    when millions of people are becoming addicted to pornographic and families are being destroyed.
    when sexual abuse is rampant in this world.
    when human trafficking is going on.
    when natural disasters like Hurricane Katrina happen.
    when people are being tortured and murdered for their religious convictions.
    when are kids are being taught about homosexuality and evolution.
    when we can’t pray in public.
    when they are trying to stop our freedom of speech.
    And where is the government when a million and a half babies’ voices are not being heard year after year after year.
    Is this the change we can believe in?
    Only Jesus Christ can bring about real change.
    Jesus Christ has this kind of transformation power.
    Look at what Romans 12:2 says,
    Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will.
    Now this is Change!
    An Agent of Change we can believe in!

  2. Randpyr, thanks for offering an excellent example of what this post was talking about.

    When we see the megachurches selling off their crystal cathedrals and spending the money on health insurance for those who can’t afford it, or feeding the poor, or sheltering the homeless, we can rethink the current system. Until then, a yearly mission trip to Nicaragua (or whatever) doesn’t fix the problems that exist right under our noses. Since the Church has abandoned that work, the other institution we created to solve large-scale problems — government — has to take its place.

    Ideal? Certainly not. I’d much rather give $20,000 a year to my church, instead of military or corporate agriculture subsidies, knowing it would lessen the suffering in the world. But until churches really start living the values of Jesus (instead of obsessing about evolution and homosexuality), somebody has to do it.

    Don’t like the current situation? Then offer a better option that gets done what Jesus told us to do!

Leave a Reply to randpyr Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.